Legal Opinion

Link Belt Engineering Co. v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1905No. 74PublishedCited by 3 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

This suit is brought, and was tried without a jury, under the Act of March 3, 1887, c. 359, 24 Stat. 505, 1 Supp. Rev. St. 559 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 752], to recover a balance said to be due upon a contract whereby the plaintiff undertook to furnish certain materials and do certain work for the government at the Washington Navy Yard. In obedience to section 7 of the act, which provides:

“That it shall be the duty of the court to cause a written opinion to be filed in the cause, setting forth the specific findings by the court of the facts therein and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Texas & St. L. Ry. Co. v. RustUnited States Circuit Court · 1883
  4. Robson v. Mississippi River Logging Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1894
  5. Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eastover Stores, Inc. v. MinnixCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Berg v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  3. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Raymond Concrete Pile Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API