Legal Opinion

People v. Morrell

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herman Cahn, J.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment is granted. The Assistant District Attorney’s failure to answer, in proper form, a question put forth by a grand juror, requires dismissal.

THE FACTS

On October 22, 1986, police officers observed defendant fleeing the scene of a restaurant burglary. He was apprehended at that time. On October 24, 1986, the District Attorney’s office sought indictment of defendant, for burglary in the third degree, by presenting the case to the Grand Jury. When the Assistant District Attorney concluded his presentation of evidence, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. BlimNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. Frank Russo & Stony Brook Systems, Inc., New York County Courts1985
  4. People v. MontalvoNew York Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. FrancisNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. ManfroNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. Isaiah Bell (081743) (Somerset County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API