Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Nathan J. Miller and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 31st day of October, 1919, overruling defendants’ objections to questions asked one of defendants in his examination before trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

Upon an examination as an adverse party before trial of a member of a firm of stockbrokers, in an action by a customer, the books of the firm having been produced, the witness was asked to look at one of the books and state the number of *185shares of a certain stock received from the Clearing House on a specified date. This question was objected to “ on the ground that you cannot require the witness to read from a book.” The witness was also asked to look at the same book and state the number of shares of the said stock purchased for plaintiff’s account. The same objection was made.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. GoldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  2. Faulk v. Aware, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Meadow Brook National Bank v. Shore Road Estates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API