Legal Opinion

Juma v. Aomo

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 28, 2013No. AC 33660PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SHELDON, J.

In this appeal, the defendant, Tom M. Aomo, claims that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the action for the dissolution of his marriage to the plaintiff, Jacqueline O. Juma, because he had initiated an action for, and ultimately obtained, a divorce from the plaintiff in Kenya. The defendant also challenges certain of the trial court’s orders related to the parties’ finances and children. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Since the plaintiff commenced this action on October 1,2009, the defendant has repeatedly attempted to challenge the court’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Vogel v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Litvaitis v. LitvaitisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Winick v. WinickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Juma v. AomoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API