Kefurt v. Hoogenraad

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 MIROSLAV KEFURT, Case No. 2:22-cv-01774-JAD-BNW derivatively on behalf of Bremach Inc., 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. 7 REINIER HOOGENRAAD, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Disqualify Counsel. ECF No. 37. Defendants 11 Hoogenraad and Montgomery opposed. ECF No. 38. Plaintiff replied. ECF No. 39. Given 12 Plaintiff has not demonstrated he had an attorney-client relationship with the attorney he seeks to 13 disqualify, which is required under Nevada’s caselaw, the Court denies the motion. 14 The essence…