Legal Opinion

COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORPORATION v. Rothberg

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 12, 1965No. 23011PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cook, Justice.

“The general rule is that an action [at law] will not be enjoined, at the instance of one not a party thereto.” Stone v. King-Hodgson Co., 140 Ga. 487, 491 (79 SE 122). “Equity will not enjoin the proceedings and processes of a court of law, unless there be some intervening equity or other proper defense of which the party, without fault on his part, cannot avail himself at law.” Code § 55-103.

In this case the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the prosecution of a suit to which it is not a party and by the result of which it will not be bound.

The fact that the plaintiff in the action…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shingler v. ShinglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Independent Gasoline Co. v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Waycross Air-Line Railroad v. Offerman & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Smith v. CuylerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  5. Stone v. King-Hodgson Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Geo Licensing Co., LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  2. Summer v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Sayers v. Forsyth Building Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Collins v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Sims v. Mayflower Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API