Legal Opinion

David L. Sandstrom v. Patrick Covello, Warden

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 20, 2025No. 5:24-cv-01344Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID L. SANDSTROM, ) Case No. 5:24-cv-01344-JWH (DTB) ) 11 Petitioner, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, 12 v. ) CONCLUSIONS, AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF 13 PATRICK COVELLO, Warden, ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE ) JUDGE 14 Respondent. ) ) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the 2 records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States 3 Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed 4 herein.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Waddington v. SarausadSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Davis v. Air Technical Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Richard Boyer v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API