Legal Opinion

Robin v. California Oil Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1963No. 814PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRUGÉ, Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this suit for workmen’s compensation benefits for total and permanent disability against his employer and his employer’s insurer. Defendants deny liability, contending that there is not sufficient proof that plaintiff’s injuries, if any, were sustained while he was on the job. From a judgment in the lower court dis*124missing plaintiff’s suit he has appealed to this court.

The sole question tendered by this appeal is whether plaintiff has established by a preponderance of the evidence that he sustained an accident during the course and scope of his employment.

On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jenkinson v. ClemonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Peart v. SlocumLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Houston v. Atlas Sewing Centers, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Porche v. Reliable Battery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Castle v. GravesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Louisiana Irrigation & Mill Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Robin v. California Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API