Legal Opinion
Callaghan v. Curtis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal from so much of the order as denied those branches of the plaintiffs motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the defendants’ counterclaims and to be relieved of her default in responding to a notice to admit, deemed the allegations in the notice to admit to be true, and granted those branches of the defendants’ cross motion which *817were for summary judgment on their fourth and fifth counterclaims must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Frackson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Ass'n v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Carlson v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cox v. HubbardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Panagiotou v. Samaritan Village, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Goldberg & Connolly v. Upgrade Contr. Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Uffer v. Travelers Companies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Cox v. HubbardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014