Legal Opinion
Lee v. Hunt
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided December 19, 1979No. Civ. A. 76-0628PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAGG, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM RULING
This action comes again before the court, this time on the motion of defendant to enforce the settlement agreement against Hugh S. Hunt (Hugh). 1 Although not formerly a party to this litigation, Hugh, the plaintiff’s only living son, has from its inception been deeply involved in the lawsuit, if not the moving force behind it. He has now been joined as a party to the motion and is the only person involved in the settlement negotiations who has not executed the final settlement agreement.
I
The allegations of plaintiff’s Complaint, more fully discussed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering and MacHine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- The Aro Corporation v. Allied Witan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Meetings & Expositions, Inc. v. Tandy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Carl M. Pearson v. Harry A. Skydell and Arnold Dutchen v. Ecological Science Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mrs. Frania Tye Lee v. Ray Lee Hunt, of the Estate of H. L. Hunt v. Hugh S. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Phillip Davis, Jr., and Betty Ann Davis v. Huskipower Outdoor Equipment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Adams Extract Co., Inc. v. Green Bay Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Fox v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.