Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Burnstine

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 13, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

The contestants apply for an examination of the subscribing witnesses to the will. The application is resisted by the proponent on the ground that section 141 of the Surrogate’s Court Act limits the right to an examination to a time prior to the filing of objections. Counsel for the proponent contends that since the contestants have already filed objections in the pending probate proceeding, the right is lost to the contestants. The application is granted. I find no support in the terms of the section for any such narrow construction.

The question raised here has been decided by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RogersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
  2. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of WoerzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of BeemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of HawleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of FelensteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API