Legal Opinion

Smith v. Spokane County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1935No. 25598. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the compensation provided in an existent legislative act relating to indigent blind persons. Defendants’ demurrer to the complaint was sustained upon the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Plaintiff elected to stand upon his complaint, and the court thereupon entered a judgment dismissing the action. From the judgment of dismissal, plaintiff has appealed.

Inasmuch as the issue in this case relates to the sufficiency of the complaint, its allegations must be considered with some particularity. We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Yeargin v. MaschkeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Rummens v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Kruesel v. CollinWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Robbins v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Dept. F.B. B. v. Thurston Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Smith v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State ex rel. Department of Finance, Budget & Business v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API