Legal Opinion

Messina v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1960Published

1Opinion of the CourtMilton M. Wecht, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment by default against one Robert Morton for injuries sustained as a result of an automobile accident. That judgment together with interest thereon from the date of entry, June 9,1959, amounting to $6,693.25, remains unpaid. An action is now brought pursuant to section 167 of the Insurance Law against Morton’s insurer, the defendant herein, and based on that action plaintiff moves for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. In opposition to this motion defendant contends that policies written pursuant to article VII of the Insurance Law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Seltzer v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Briskman v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. American Surety Co. v. DiamondNew York Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API