Legal Opinion
In Re Wrobel
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 1, 2001No. 1-19-10388PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL J.'KAPLAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Consolidated for purposes of decision only are the Trustee’s objections to two Debtors’ claims of exemption in bank accounts alleged to be exempt (to the extent of 90% thereof) under New York Civil Practice Laws and Rules § 5205(d). 1
The Debtors in these cases cite the cases of In re Maidman, 141 B.R. 571 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1992) and In re Coolbaugh, 250 B.R. 162 (Bankr.W.D.N.Y.2000) for the proposition that in addition to any other exemption which they may claim, including the $2500 cash exemption provided for by § 283 of the New York Debtor and Creditor Law,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Harold Dubroff, Debtor. Harold Dubroff v. First National Bank of Glens Falls, Creditor-Appellee, Gregory Harris, Trustee, Trustee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- In Re MaidmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- In Re CoolbaughUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2000
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re WiltsieUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- In Re DziedzicUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2009