Legal Opinion
Kane County, Utah v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 25, 2019No. 17-739Published
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 17-739C; 17-1991C (Consolidated) Filed: September 25, 2019 ) KANE COUNTY, UTAH, individually and ) Keywords: Attorney Fees; Lodestar on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) Cross-Check; Class Action; Common ) Fund Doctrine Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Alan I. Saltman, Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. Robert O. Fleming, Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, Atlanta, GA, Of Counsel. Mollie Lenore Finnan, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Theodore H. Frank v. Netflix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Greenlee County, Arizona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.