Legal Opinion

Workinger v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

George S. Workinger appeals from the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review that affirmed the referee’s denial of benefits to Workinger. We affirm.

Dodson Insurance Group (Dodson Insurance) employed Workinger as a full-time marketing representative. Workinger signed an employment contract with Dodson Insurance stipulating that he would not act as licensed agent for any insurance company except Dodson Insurance and that he would not place or aid in placing business with any other insurance company except for his own personal insurance. (UCBR Finding of Fact…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. American Racing Equipment, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Smith v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Williams v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Geisinger Health Plan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Geisinger Health Plan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API