Norton v. Wood
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Lyon District Court. Action by Wood against Norton and two others to recover upon a promissory note, and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure its payment. Judgment was rendered against Norton and defendant William Muff; and the former brings the case to this court. The opinion herein, filed July 6, 1895, states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
MabtiN, C. J. :
The original suit was brought July 7, 1890, by said James B. Wood against said John Norton and William Muff and. Henry Muff to recover judgment upon a promissory note executed by said William Muff in favor of said Wood, and to foreclose a mortgage on real estate given to secure the same. It was alleged in the petition that, after the execution of the note and mortgage, William Muff conveyed the land to Norton and Henry Muff, “who, as a part of the consideration thereof, agreed' to pay the amount due” Wood. Personal service was made on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
3Cited by10 opinions
- Strange v. CrismonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Peoples State Bank v. Hoisington Cooperative Mercantile Manufacturing Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Hughes v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Chickasha Light, Heat & Power Co. v. BezdicheckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Brown v. YatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.