Floyd v. State

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with and convicted of engaging in and pursuing the occupation of selling spirituous, vinous and malt liquors.

The indictment is attacked because it does not allege that he engaged in the business of selling intoxicating liquors. The statute provides that in local option territory if anyone shall engage in the business or follow the occupation of selling intoxicating liquors in such territory except as permitted by law, he shall' be punished. We do not believe this indictment is sufficient. -Spirituous, vinous and malt liquors may or may not be…