In re Brueck & Wilson Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the Brueck & Wilson Company, a bankrupt. On review of referee’s order expunging the claim of one Rotlienherg.
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, District Judge.
The referee has ordered that Rothen-berg’s claim should be expunged, and this order is here on review. The testimony fully warrants the following conclusions:(1) That the bankrupt corporation, while solvent and having a surplus sufficient to authorize the transaction, bought from one Blum *70his stock in the corpqration, for which it issued its 12 promissory-notes, each dated October 11, 1915, each for $625, with 5 per cent, per annum interest from January 1, 1916, the first note to be due April 1, 1916, and the remaining notes quarterly thereafter until April 1, 1918, when…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Fechheimer Fisher Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- In re Tichenor-Grand Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1913
- Grasselli Chemical Co. v. Ætna Explosives Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1918
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robinson v. WangemannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. Gleneagles Inv. Co., Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Matthews Bros. v. PullenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1920
- Keith v. KilmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1919
- Boggs v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.