Legal Opinion

Ulvestad v. Dolphin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1929No. 21132. En BancPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

Tbis is an action brought to recover in damages for an unlawful arrest and a false imprisonment.

At tbe time of tbe occurrences wbicb give rise to tbe action, William B. Severyns was chief of police of tbe city of Seattle, and tbe New Amsterdam Casualty Company was surety on bis official bond. C. E. Dolphin was a captain of police of tbe same city, and A. J. Hill and C. A. Seavers were policemen of tbe city. Eric Ulvestad was a bachelor, some fifty-five years of age, and for many years bad been a resident of tbe city. He owned real property situated therein of considerable value. He bad caused…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pavish v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. William Whirl v. C. v. (Buster) Kern and Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Donald D. Hesselgesser v. William J. Reilly, Sheriff of Spokane County, Washington, E. Byron Franz, and Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. Kent v. WhitakerWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. City of Tacoma v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. McMurry Energy Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API