Legal Opinion

State v. Clites

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1991No. 90-P-2189PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nader, Judge.

This appeal is from the trial court’s decision, finding appellant, William Clites, guilty of driving under suspension in violation of R.C. 4507.02, and was submitted to this court on the briefs of counsel.

On July 2, 1989, Officer Gyoker, a Brimfield Township patrolman, observed appellant traveling north on State Route 43 at approximately 1:56 a.m. The officer testified that he observed the appellant’s automobile “straddling both northbound lanes” or otherwise “traveling down the middle of the road.” As appellant proceeded onto the entrance ramp of Interstate 76, the wheels of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pillow v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. State v. MorrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Mason v. BrockIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  5. Sparrow v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HirschOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Royal Ins. Co. of Am. v. Crowne Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Reinbolt v. KernOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. SkimmerhornOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API