Paul Zartman and Brenda Cameron, Individually v. William G. Zartman, III, Individually and as Successor Co-Trustee of the Marilyn M. Zartman Revocable Trust Kim Zartman
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Shepard, Senior Judge.
[1] The common law "best evidence rule" has been formalized through the modern Rules of Evidence employed by both state and federal courts. The series of provisions starting at Rule 1001 cover problems like the one in this case, which turns on the *244 language used in a trust document not presently possessed by either party.
[2] After reviewing such caselaw as exists and a number of respected treatises, we conclude that the trial court wrongly applied Evidence Rule 1008 in the course of a summary judgment proceeding. We remand with directions that the court reconsider that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sheehan Construction Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
- The City of Indianapolis, Indiana, and the Indianapolis Department of Public Works v. Evelyn CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Berkshire v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Township of Haddon v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Facundo Ramos-Osario v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2026