Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hales v. ProEquities, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 11, 2003No. 1011015Published

1Concurrence

The Haleses assert that preparation for a jury trial is more expensive than preparation for an arbitration. In Big ValleyHome Center, Inc. v. Mullican, 774 So.2d 558, 562 (Ala. 2000), this Court found prejudice where the party seeking arbitration had waited until the eve of trial to invoke its right and the attorneys for the party opposing arbitration "had invested time and money preparing for a trial on the merits." Yet in JerichoManagement, Inc. v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. ofTennessee, 811 So.2d 514, 515 (Ala. 2001), this Court found no intent to abandon the right to arbitrate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Big Valley Home Center, Inc. v. MullicanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Jericho Mgmt. Inc. v. Fidelity Nat. Title Ins. Company of TennesseeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API