Legal Opinion
United States v. Gupta
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 26, 2012No. 11 Cr. 907(JSR); No. 11 Civ. 7566(JSR)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
That separate government agencies having overlapping jurisdiction will cooperate in the factual investigation of the same alleged misconduct makes perfect sense; but that they can then disclaim such cooperation to avoid their respective discovery obligations makes no sense at all.
During the factual investigation that preceded the bringing of these two actions-a criminal insider trading case and a parallel civil enforcement action, both brought against defendant Rajat Gupta-Assistant United States Attorneys (“AUSAs”) from the United States…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Carmine AvellinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Faisal Nabin Kashem v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- State v. GuerreraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- United States v. MartomaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. RaniereDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- United States v. GuptaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.