Newman v. Phalen
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from District Court, Sherman County ; Reese Tatum, Judge. Action by Emmet Phalen against Emma R. Newman and Arthur Ross, Sheriff. To review judgment for plaintiff, defendant Ngw-man brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.
The defendant in error Phalen instituted this action against Emma R. Newman, plaintiff in error, and Arthur Ross, sheriff of Sherman county, to remove the cloud from a half section of land in said county, the title to which was in Phalen cast thereon by a judgment lien obtained by filing an abstract of judgment and to enjoin the sale thereof by the sheriff by virtue of an execution then in bis bands and issued on the judgment and out of the court rendering the same. The evidence in the record authorized a finding by the trial court that on the 23d day of February, 1917, defendant in error…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eylar v. EylarTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Collum v. Sanger Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1904
- Grace v. Wade & MainsTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Watkins v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Ramirez v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aldridge v. North East Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Herbert v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Long Falls Realty Company v. Anchor Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Garner v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Triangle Supply Company v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.