Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Martinelli

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 22, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

The defendants moved at the pre-trial conference to amend their answer to plead the statute of limitations.

Since Judge Samuel H. Kaufman has held that Section 16(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b), relating to the filing of consents, is inapplicable to this suit, D.C., 120 F.Supp. 383, the defendants are precluded from using the filing dates of such consents nevertheless filed as a basis for asserting the statute of limitations found in Sections 6 and 7 of the Portal to Portal Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 255, 266. The statute of limitations runs *383from the filing date of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burrell v. La Follette Coach LinesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1951
  2. MacDonald v. MartinelliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunlop v. State of Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API