Legal Opinion

Investors Realty Co. v. City of Harrisburg

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1923No. Appeal, 11PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The plaintiff’s action was brought to recover the amount paid by it to the city on a municipal lien for street paving in excess of the amount which the municipality wás authorized to charge against the plaintiff’s property. The assessment was made February 6, 1914. On March 10th, the plaintiff paid to the city 10% of the amount, and on July 10th of the same year a lien was filed to secure the balance of the assessment. In the following November, the plaintiff, having entered into a contract for the sale of the property free of liens, paid the amount of the municipal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Mason v. FearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. People Ex Rel. Conway v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Bailey v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Shenango Furnace Co. v. Fairfield TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Contracts of Beneficial SocietiesPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1930
  2. Graham v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. In re Tuberculosis Hospital, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1926
  4. Womer v. Schlottman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API