Flamme v. Wolf Insurance Agency
Nebraska Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceShanahan, J.
Since the majority has correctly concluded that summary judgment was improperly granted, I concur that the district court’s judgment must be reversed. However, an aspect of the majority opinion should be emphasized and even underscored as an innovation in Nebraska law — expansion or enlargement *475of the cause of action for misrepresentation of a material fact, sometimes called “fraudulent misrepresentation.”
If some have not taken note, as the result of the Flamme decision today, Nebraska recognizes a cause of action for “negligent misrepresentation,” which might be more accurately labeled…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ryan v. KanneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Beeck v. KapalisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Gilliland v. Elmwood PropertiesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Duffy v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Guardian Construction Co. v. Tetra Tech Richardson, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.