Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Flamme v. Wolf Insurance Agency

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1991No. 90-1222, 90-1223Published

1ConcurrenceShanahan, J.

Since the majority has correctly concluded that summary judgment was improperly granted, I concur that the district court’s judgment must be reversed. However, an aspect of the majority opinion should be emphasized and even underscored as an innovation in Nebraska law — expansion or enlargement *475of the cause of action for misrepresentation of a material fact, sometimes called “fraudulent misrepresentation.”

If some have not taken note, as the result of the Flamme decision today, Nebraska recognizes a cause of action for “negligent misrepresentation,” which might be more accurately labeled…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ryan v. KanneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Beeck v. KapalisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Gilliland v. Elmwood PropertiesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Duffy v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Guardian Construction Co. v. Tetra Tech Richardson, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API