Roush v. Roush

Potter, P. J.,

— This action for divorce is brought on the ground of cruelty and barbarous treatment, with which, at this stage of the proceedings, we have nothing to do.

We have an application to strike off the libel for the reason that in the affidavit the name of “Adolph Borrisen” was inadvertently typed as the respondent instead of “Noah Roush.” On motion, we allowed the affidavit to be amended by the insertion of the name of the respondent, which disposes of this rule.

We also have a rule for counsel fees, which is the main contention. We have no legal enactment allowing counsel fees in…