Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 15, 2007No. Criminal 05-0066(PLF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the government’s motion pursuant to Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to “correct clear error” by the Court with respect to the sentence imposed on the defendant. Upon consideration of the motion, the opposition, the reply, the entire record in this case, and the relevant statutes and case law, the Court will deny the motion. 1

I. BACKGROUND

On September 8, 2006, defendant Walter Anderson pled guilty to Counts 5, 6, and 11 of the Superseding Indictment under Rule 11(c)(1)(C) of the Federal…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. MorilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Frank E. ReadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. HelmsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Caston v. Executive Office for United States AttorneysDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  3. Anderson v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
  4. Aumand et al. v. DHMCDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
  5. In re: Mc2 Capital Partners, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API