Legal Opinion

Abraham v. National City Bank Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1990No. 89-237PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

The only issue before us is whether the court of appeals was correct in affirming the trial court’s decision that plaintiff-appellant Abraham’s cause of action against defendant-appellee National City is time barred by R.C. 1101.08(F).1 For the reasons that follow, we hold that R.C. 1101.08(F) applies to the facts of this case and bars Abraham’s action against the bank.

R.C. 1101.08(A)(1) lists the internal records that banks are required to keep for one year; R.C. 1101.08(A)(2) lists the internal records that a bank must keep for six years, including deposit and withdrawal tickets, ledger…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. VolpeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Children's Hospital v. Ohio Department of Public WelfareOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. ConyersOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Palmer Manufacturing & Supply, Inc. v. Bancohio National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Watford v. Ohio Bur. of Motor VehiclesOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Hubbard Family Trust v. TNT Land Holdings, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Swartz v. HouseholderOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API