Legal Opinion

United States v. Segelman

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 8, 1954No. 11252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The provisions of Section 2255, Title 28, United States Code, may not be employed as the appellant, Segelman, seeks to make use of them, in order to correct alleged errors committed by the court below during Segelman’s trial. The sentences imposed upon Segelman were not imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States and the court had jurisdiction to impose the sentences. Segelman appealed from the judgments against him, D.C., 86 F.Supp. 114, but his appeal was dismissed by this court for want of prosecution. No question cognizable under Section 2255 was before the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SegelmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. United States v. SegelmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. GoldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  2. Lyman Moody Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. State v. JarrettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1972
  5. United States v. ClaytonDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API