Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Roxford Knitting Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1920No. Appeal, No. 3PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 3, May T., 1920, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Dauphin Co., Commonwealth Docket, 1918, No. 71, for defendant, in case of Commonwealth v. Koxford Knitting Company. Appeal by defendant from account settled by auditor general and state treasurer for tax on corporate loans. Before Kunkel, P. J. The case was tried by the court without a jury.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 3, May T., 1920, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Dauphin Co., Commonwealth Docket, 1918, No. 71, for defendant, in case of Commonwealth v. Koxford Knitting Company. Appeal by defendant from account settled by auditor general and state treasurer for tax on corporate loans. Before Kunkel, P. J. The case was tried by the court without a jury. The court entered judgment for defendant for reasons stated in following opinion by Kunkel, P. J.: This is an appeal from the settlement of an account against the defendant company for the loan tax for the year 1917. By agreement it has…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the court below directing it to be entered.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Co. for Guaranteeing Mortgages v. Guaranty Realty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Commonwealth v. Megargee Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company Tax CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Frederick's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Commonwealth v. Janesville Coal Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API