Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Rising Sun Entertainment, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 2004Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

I agree with the majority’s excellent analysis of the free expression issues. However, I believe that the Board’s regulation is not unconstitutionally vague and therefore, dissent from that portion of the majority opinion.

Board Regulation 13.102 states, in pertinent part:(a) General. Retail licensees may discount the price of alcoholic beverages for a consecutive period of time not to exceed 2 hours in a business day, but may not engage in discount pricing practices between 12 midnight and the legal closing hour. Retail licensees may…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. AM. BOOKSELLERS ASS'N, INC. v. RendellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Suburban Manor/Highland Hall Care Center v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API