Legal Opinion

Martin v. . the New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Company, Ltd.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 17, 1915, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 17, 1915, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. This action was brought to recover royalties claimed to be due under, a contract entered into between Walter S. Wilkinson and Richard D. Upham, the plaintiff’s assignors, and the Trinidad Asphalt Company, whereby there was granted to said company the exclusive right for the entire life of the patents to use a process for the refining of asphalt for which letters patent had been granted to said…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Cuddeback, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1919
  2. Martin v. New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API