Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Quinn

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1948No. L. A. 20218Published

1Opinion of the Court

31 Cal.2d 661 (1948)

ARTHUR W. SHERMAN et al., Appellants,

v.

JOHN R. QUINN, as County Tax Assessor, etc., et al., Respondents.

L. A. No. 20218.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Apr. 3, 1948.

Zuckerman & Edmunds, Edward K. Zuckerman, Arthur E. Edmunds and William E. James for Appellants.

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, and Gordon Boller, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondents.

EDMONDS, J.

Arthur W. Sherman and his wife are seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the assessor of Los Angeles County to assess to them real property being purchased by them under a contract of conditional sale in order…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Springer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Babcock v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Eisley v. MohanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API