In Re the Marriage of Gray
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGarrard, Judge
I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the husband has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the division of property.
I also agree that the fees awarded for the services of Robert Moise are in excess of any testimony adduced at trial. I would vacate that portion of the decree and remand for further proceedings.
I find the same defect in the award of attorneys’ fees. The parties introduced evidence of the reasonable value of counsel’s services. The award entered by the court was approximately $9000 more than the highest valuation testified to.
Applying the reasoning of U. S. Aircraft…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- U. S. Aircraft Financing, Inc. v. JankovichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. State ex rel. RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
- Hartford Life Insurance v. HopeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
- Western & Southern Indemnity Co. v. NewmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
- Indianapolis Chair Manufacturing Co. v. SwiftIndiana Supreme Court · 1892