State v. Francisco

OPINION

REID, Judge.

This case presents an appeal as of right from the misdemeanor conviction of posses*544sion of a controlled substance, T.C.A. § 39-6-417(b).

The appellant, David Francisco, assigns for review the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, the sufficiency of the evidence, jury instructions and the sentence.

The record does not show reversible error and the sentence is appropriate.

MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

The appellant, at the time of the offense, was a narcotics detective on the Hamilton County Sheriffs department. A Fort Oglethorpe police officer told the appellant’s supervisor…