Legal Opinion

Vercruise v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1922No. 22,783Published

1Per curiam

Action for damages for an alleged assault and battery committed by defendant upon plaintiff, in which plaintiff had a verdict and defendant appealed from an order denying a new trial.

Our examination of the record leads to the conclusion that the question whether defendant assaulted plaintiff, and the nature and .Character of the assault, was on the evidence a question of fact for the jury. We discover no reason for interference. The verdict for $1,000 was reduced one-half by the trial court. We think the order justified. The case Is unlike Ger-mann v. Great Northern Ry. Co. 114 Minn. 347, 130…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Germann v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API