Legal Opinion

Frizzell v. Omaha St. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1903No. 1,879PublishedCited by 20 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, Agnes Frizzell, brought an action against the defendant, the Omaha Street Railway Company, for .$25,300 damages for negligence in the operation of one of its cars upon which she was a passenger, which she alleged inflicted serious injury upon her person. She averred in her petition that while she was riding upon this car it came to a complete stop; that she then arose from her seat and stepped upon the running board, which extended along the side of the car, and was in the act of alighting; that the conductor of the car saw her thus alighting, and that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Shutte v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Express Co. v. Kountze BrothersSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Humes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smith v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. Miller v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. ChristensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Birmingham Railway L. & P. Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. LampmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API