In re Provda

OPINION OF THE COURT

Respondent’s application for reargument, received and read *222as an application for mitigation of the one-year suspension, effective February 4, 1994, originally imposed (195 AD2d 17), is unanimously granted to the extent indicated. In light of the special circumstances presented the sanction is reduced to a three-month suspension. Since no contention has been raised that respondent has failed to comply with the order of suspension, respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective May 4, 1994, without further proceedings. It does not appear that any purpose would be…