Legal Opinion

State v. Siggers

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1986No. 18065-KWPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARVIN, Judge.

We granted a writ to review the correctness of defendant’s convictions of resisting an officer and of battery of a police officer. LRS 14:34.2, 108. We find that the State did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant committed a battery on the officers and that defendant’s intentional resistance of the officers was in response to the unlawful restraint (arrest) and was not criminal conduct defined by LRS 14:108. Accordingly, we reverse the convictions and discharge defendant.

FACTS

We review the evidence most favorably in support of the prosecution, recognizing that it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Lewis v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. State v. MorvantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  4. White v. MorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  5. State v. LindsaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. ReddochDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
  2. State v. SiggersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  3. State v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. State v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API