State v. Siggers
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MARVIN, Judge.
We granted a writ to review the correctness of defendant’s convictions of resisting an officer and of battery of a police officer. LRS 14:34.2, 108. We find that the State did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant committed a battery on the officers and that defendant’s intentional resistance of the officers was in response to the unlawful restraint (arrest) and was not criminal conduct defined by LRS 14:108. Accordingly, we reverse the convictions and discharge defendant.
FACTS
We review the evidence most favorably in support of the prosecution, recognizing that it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lewis v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. MorvantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- White v. MorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- State v. LindsaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holmes v. ReddochDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
- State v. SiggersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- State v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- State v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996