Legal Opinion

State v. Dickinson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to St. Clair; Eldredge, J., presiding. Ejectment by the State of Michigan against Don M. Dickinson and another. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This action is ejectment, brought by the State of Michigan against Don M. Dickinson and another, to recover certain lands situate on Stromness or Dickinson Island, being a part of St. Clair Flats, in St. Clair county. There are two cases. While the title to only the lands described in the declaration can be settled in this case, the decision of the court will control as to the entire island, except the private claim, in all amounting to about 3,500 acres. From a judgment in favor of the defendants, the case is brought here by the plaintiff by writ of error.

The cases were tried before the late…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. McIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Ricard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  3. Buttz v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Fletcher v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Venice of America Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Territory of Hawaii v. Hutchinson Sugar Plantation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  3. Matthews v. McLouthMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API