Legal Opinion

Gustafson v. Faris

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1976No. Docket 24751PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD. E. Holbrook, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment. The motion was apparently based upon GCR 1963, 117.2(1), which provides for a summary judgment in cases where plaintiffs fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Since motions based upon GCR 1963, 117.2(1) are to be tested by the pleadings alone, Todd v Biglow, 51 Mich App 346; 214 NW2d 733 (1974), a substantial portion of plaintiffs’ complaint is here quoted:

"1. That plaintiff herein is the duly appointed Administrator of the Estate of said decedent pursuant to proceedings had in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Todd v. BiglowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. TOMS v. McCONNELMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Perlmutter v. WhitneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Allinger v. KellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Wargelin v. Sisters of Mercy Health Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Stump v. Ashland, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Williams v. Citizens Mutual Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API