Legal Opinion
Young v. City of Morehead
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 20, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Sims
Reversing in first case, affirming in last two cases.
These three actions are closely related and have been heard together and all will be disposed of in this opinion. In Young v. City of Morehead a contract Young had with the City to furnish it gas was held to violate sec. 164 of the Kentucky Constitution. In McCullough v. Young the court refused to let McCullough file an intervening- petition. In Eyl v. Young a general demurrer was sustained to the petition. The three appeals followed from those rulings.
On Feb. 27, 1936, Young and the City entered into a written contract whereby he agreed to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Princeton v. Princeton Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Willis v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Kentucky Utilities Co. v. GinsbergCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- American Car & Foundry Co. v. Johnson CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Landrum v. Louisville N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- E.M. Bailey Distributing Co. v. Conagra, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- BFI Waste Systems of North America, Inc. v. Huntington Woods Neighborhood Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
- Ledbetter Water District v. Crittenden-Livingston Water DistrictKentucky Supreme Court · 2020