Legal Opinion
Brody v. Village of Port Chester
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 5, 2005No. 05-0446-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant William Brody has been fighting the taking of his property for the better part of seven years. In 2001, after a number of public meetings, the Village of Port Chester (the ‘Village”) finally condemned his property for use in a large-scale municipal redevelopment project. Brody sued in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the Village, acting pursuant to New York’s Eminent Domain Procedure Law, N.Y. EM. DOM. PROC. LAW §§ 101-709 (McKinney 2005) (“EDPL”), violated his rights under the Due Process Clause of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bay Harbour Management, L.C. v. Lehman Bros. Holdings (In Re Lehman Bros. Holdings)District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Harrell v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Brody v. Village of Port ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Ferreira v. Town of East HamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- City of Midwest City v. House of Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.