Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Drejza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying the claimant from receiving benefits because he refused employment without good copse (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 2, par. [e]) and holding $375 in benefits received recoverable because of a willful concealment of a pertinent fact (Labor Law, § 597, subd. 4). Whether a claimant has refused employment without good cause is a factual issue and, thus, the board’s determination must be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence (e.g., Matter of Hoffman [Catherwood], 34 A D 2d 871). In the instant case the only…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. In re the Claim of BaehrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. In re Claim of DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. In re the Claim of BruceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. In re the Claim of StarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API