Legal Opinion · Dissent

Phelps v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1947No. 13110-13113Published

1DissentRiddick, Circuit Judge

In No. 13,110, Phelps v. United States, No. 13,112, Lechnyr v. United States, and No. 13,113, Hicks v. United States, I concur in the result.

I am unable to concur in the conclusions reached in No. 13,111, Peters v. United States, on the question of immunity from prosecution1 granted by section 202 of the Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 922.

*877By section 202(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 922(b), the Administrator is authorized to require any person engaged in a business dealing with any commodity to furnish information under oath or affirmation or otherwise on demand…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. In re HoffmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API