Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Collom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendant John T. Blaisdell (impleaded with J. Frank Collom and others) from a judgment of the district court for Henne-pin county, entered, on the decision of Hooker, J., in an action by plaintiff to enforce a mechanic’s lien, establishing a lien to the amount of $1,317.99 in favor of defendant Joseph H. Brinton, and a lien to the amount of $1,404 in favor of defendants James H. and E. E. Drake, partners as the Drake Company, upon the interests of both Blaisdell…

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendant John T. Blaisdell (impleaded with J. Frank Collom and others) from a judgment of the district court for Henne-pin county, entered, on the decision of Hooker, J., in an action by plaintiff to enforce a mechanic’s lien, establishing a lien to the amount of $1,317.99 in favor of defendant Joseph H. Brinton, and a lien to the amount of $1,404 in favor of defendants James H. and E. E. Drake, partners as the Drake Company, upon the interests of both Blaisdell and Collom in certain real estate in Minneapolis.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

In October, 1887, the defendant Collom bargained with the defendant Blaisdell for the purchase of certain lots mentioned in the complaint, and he entered into a. written contract with him, in and by which he agreed to pay therefor the sum of $23,000 within three years from the date of the contract, and to commence at once the construction of a stone and brick dwelling thereon, 50x70 feet, at a cost of not less than $20,000. Blaisdell on his part agreed to execute to Collom a warranty deed of the lots upon the completion of the building and payment of the purchase-money, or the execution of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Colman v. GoodnowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Wood v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lamoreaux v. AnderschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Wentworth v. TubbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Burns v. SewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Shapleigh v. HullSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  5. In the Matter of Wiltse Brothers Corporation, Bankrupt. Whitehead & Kales Company v. William H. Dempster, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API