Legal Opinion
In re Friedman
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1945PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
Proceeding for appraisal and payment of stock under section 161 of the Bailroad Law. The petitioners, claiming to be objecting stockholders of the respondent, a domestic railroad corporation, move for the appointment of appraisers to value their stock, following its merger into another railroad corporation under sections 140 and 141 of the Railroad Law.
It is undisputed that the petitioners’ shares of stock, except for 100 of 110 shares owned by petitioner Friedman, were registered in the names of other persons on the respondent’s books. In their written objections to the merger and demands…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Matter of TimmisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Pacific National Bank v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- U.S. Radiator Co. v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- In Re the Elections of Directors of George Ringler & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Valley International Properties, Inc. v. Los Campeones, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,524 Oscar Gruss, and Oscar Gruss & Son v. The Curtis Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Stephenson v. LandeggerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Bache & Co. v. General Instrument Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Berger v. BergerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.